Narrowing down psy op irradiation
Recently I wrote about artificial blue light as one of attribute of Aquarius era. Finally I managed to get some measurements.
Picture worth thousand words.
Laptop with color profile applied:
Laptop without color profile:
Smartphone:
Light in my room in the "warm" mode:
Light in my room in the default mode (some people frankly call these lamps "daylight"):
And few more words about the terms... I realized, finally, that being a victim of some superior force is more sane than being just not fit to normal lifestyle of lay people. When I talk that light of the lamps is harmful to me, the reaction is usually more or less open contempt, while when I say that I am being irradiated by psy ops, people react with interest. So since there is already spread legend about psy op irradiation, harmful, hidden and coming from the technologies (blaming 5G masts etc...) I think it worth to hijack a phrase for blue light since it fits all criteria but can be measured and how it affects eyes, nerves etc. is researchable.
One of common reactions of people is
to ask what is the goal of psy ops? why they do it after all? This is
a rather stupid question though it can be addressed. Psy operators are not
the beneficiaries of the irradiation same way as callcenter
operators who make cold calls to push a loan to you are not beneficiaries
of these calls, they pronounce a text which is as pointless for them as
it is for you, just to get some money for living. Same way psy ops
(people who produce, install, turn on these lights, and yell on me when I
turn them off) are not the beneficiaries of blue light and other
Aquarius stuff, they are agents acting mostly uncounciously. So there
are some true actors, some masters behind them? Huh... in terms of will,
of human or human-like acting and goals, no, but for the sake of
building a model it might be good to imagine a (fake) actor, keeping in
mind, however, that it is just a metaphor, same way, as, for instance,
the "goal" of evolution; it helps same way as good wording ("psy op
irradiation" instead of "blue light"). Mr. Xaliavschik,
for instance, argues that there are insectoids who took control over
society to make humanity look more like insects' colony. That's make
sense if not to stick with the image of insectoids as some supernatural
creatures, but think of it in more abstract manner, just like, for
example, the author of "Debt, first 5000 years"
argues that corporations are angels - not as supernatural creatures,
but formally, they fit the definition - as bodies who can be subjects in
peoples' relationships but are not people themselves. So, here I'm
trying to find good names for the things I'm describing, after all, any
new idea starts with new names for the already known things.